What is the difference between an intended and an incidental beneficiary




















The insurance company agrees to provide coverage in the event that the car takes on damage in an automobile accident. The one who benefits most from this agreement, however, is not the owner of the car but the repair shop that will be responsible for correcting the physical damage done to the car. The repair shop in this example effectively becomes the third party beneficiary due to the fact that they're receiving the money from the insurance company and not the car owner.

A third-party beneficiary may also be a business entity or individual that has legal rights when it comes to enforcing a contract. A parent may lease a car for their child, for example. Even though the child in this example was not directly involved in forging the agreement, if the dealership fails to meet their obligations, the child can exercise certain rights as a third party beneficiary and pursue legal action to force the dealership to uphold the obligations they agreed to with the parent.

Under most circumstances, a third-party beneficiary must be named as the intended beneficiary of a contract to be able to pursue legal rights under the contract.

The rights of a third-party beneficiary are more clear-cut if that person or business is specifically named in the contract. In such cases, a third-party beneficiary clause is added that identifies an individual or company that expects to benefit from the agreement. This right is strengthened in law if the third-party beneficiary is aware of the agreement and the intended benefit. For example, say a parent signed a lease and made a security deposit on a rental apartment for a child to live in while attending college.

The student arrives in town and is denied access to the apartment. Adding insult to injury, the apartment has been rented to someone else. The student and the parent both have the right to demand compensation for the failure of the landlord to meet the terms of the contract. Real Estate Investing. How To Start A Business. Investing Essentials. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Use precise geolocation data.

Select personalised content. Create a personalised content profile. Measure ad performance. Select basic ads. Create a personalised ads profile. The intended beneficiary is justified in their reliance on a promise that has been made in a contract.

It doesn't matter if they learn about this promise from any of the following:. It also doesn't matter if the promise is intended to satisfy the promisee's contractual obligations, as a gift, or something else entirely. If the beneficiary's justifiable reliance on a promise undergoes a material change, that change precludes any modification or discharge of the agreement that the beneficiary did not consent to. Although there isn't any novation or change in the beneficiary's position, the promisor and promisee' power to vary the promisor's obligations to the beneficiary is nullified in the event that the beneficiary assents to the promise in question in a manner which is invited by either of the other parties.

For a third party beneficiary to be able to claim rights under a contract , they must be named as an intended beneficiary and cannot be an incidental beneficiary.

The burden of proof that they are in fact an intended beneficiary is on the third party. A breach of contract would result in a loss of revenue for the winery, but it would have no legal standing to enforce anything in the contract.

When one or both parties to a contract intend for a third party to benefit, the third party becomes an intended beneficiary. Most of the time, contracts state this intent explicitly. Donee beneficiaries fall into this category, as do creditor beneficiaries. A creditor beneficiary receives the benefit of a contract as a repayment for a debt owed by one of the parties in the contract. If Sally agrees, she becomes a creditor beneficiary because she collects the payment contractually due to John as payment of the debt John owes Sally.

Legally, both classes of intended beneficiaries may pursue legal enforcement of the contract. Donee beneficiaries typically may only pursue enforcement from the promisor once the promisee has met the obligations outlined in the contract. Since the promisee technically owes a creditor beneficiary something prior to entering the contract, creditor beneficiaries typically have legal avenues to go after payment from both parties.

The insurance company and the insured individual enter the contract, with the insurance company acting as promisor and the insured as the promisee. The insurance company technically owes a benefit to the insured individual. The named beneficiaries act as third parties and the insured individual intends for them to receive the benefit as a gift, rather than as repayment for a debt.

Debt Management. Estate Planning. Your Privacy Rights. To change or withdraw your consent choices for Investopedia.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000